EyeClick Logo
Get a Quote
EyeClick Logo
Blog
Article

Best Interactive Activity Systems for Senior Living (2026)

The best interactive activity system for a senior living community depends on 1 question: are you engaging a room of residents or 1 resident at a time? Projection systems like EyeClick BEAM and Tovertafel serve group programming, companion robots like PARO and ElliQ serve 1:1 needs, and content platforms like iN2L by LifeLoop sit in between.


Activity directors rarely get a straight comparison across these categories. This guide compares the 6 systems we see most often on senior living shortlists, across the criteria that drive the decision: group versus individual engagement, dementia-stage fit, mobility required, published pricing where it exists, and staffing load.


Full disclosure: we make one of these systems (EyeClick BEAM). Competitor claims below come from their own websites as of June 2026, and we flag where each alternative is the better choice. Several of these systems solve problems ours does not.


How we compared


Every system was evaluated on 5 criteria using the vendor's own published materials. Where a vendor does not publish a number (most do not publish prices), we say so rather than guess.


  1. Group vs individual: How many residents can engage at once?
  2. Dementia-stage fit: Which stages does the vendor design for, by its own description?
  3. Mobility required: Can wheelchair users or bed-bound residents participate?
  4. Price band: Only where publicly listed. "Quote-based" means the vendor publishes no price.
  5. Staffing load: How much staff attention a typical session takes.


The comparison at a glance


System

Category

Group vs individual

Dementia-stage fit (per vendor)

Mobility required

Price band (public, Jun 2026)

Staffing load

EyeClick BEAM

Projection, active group play

Whole room; floor, wall, or table

Active group play for early to middle stages; calmer sensory scenes for lower-ability groups

Mixed; seated, standing, and wheelchair users play together

From $5,796, published

1 facilitator runs a room-scale session

Tover Tovertafel

Projection, dementia-specific table play

1 to small group around a table

Purpose-built for dementia; 47 games across 5 difficulty levels incl. middle and late stages

Seated; small hand movements suffice

Quote-based (US); device plus games subscription

Low; designed for play with minimal staff direction

omiVista / Mobii (OM Interactive; US channel SensoryOne)

Projection, mobile sensory

1 to small group; cart moves room to room

Dementia Care Suite (200+ activities); sensory focus suits middle and late stages

Lowest; projects onto tables, floors, and beds

Quote-based

Staff move, set up, and facilitate each session

PARO

Companion robot (therapeutic seal)

1:1

Studied for agitation and anxiety in dementia care

None; handheld, works at bedside

Not published; third-party listings around $6,100, lease around $169/month

1:1 facilitation; shared-touch device needs cleaning between users

ElliQ

Companion robot (voice AI)

1:1; built for older adults living alone

Designed for independent older adults, not marketed as a memory care product

None physically; requires verbal interaction

$39-$59/month by plan, plus $249 one-time fee, published

Minimal after setup; designed for unsupervised home use

iN2L by LifeLoop

Engagement content platform

Both; 65"/75" group touchscreens and a 23" mobile cart

7,000+ content items incl. dementia-focused content

Seated; touch interaction required

Quote-based

Staff-led sessions; adds engagement tracking for staff

EyeClick BEAM

Category

Projection, active group play

Group vs individual

Whole room; floor, wall, or table

Dementia-stage fit (per vendor)

Active group play for early to middle stages; calmer sensory scenes for lower-ability groups

Mobility required

Mixed; seated, standing, and wheelchair users play together

Price band (public, Jun 2026)

From $5,796, published

Staffing load

1 facilitator runs a room-scale session

Tover Tovertafel

Category

Projection, dementia-specific table play

Group vs individual

1 to small group around a table

Dementia-stage fit (per vendor)

Purpose-built for dementia; 47 games across 5 difficulty levels incl. middle and late stages

Mobility required

Seated; small hand movements suffice

Price band (public, Jun 2026)

Quote-based (US); device plus games subscription

Staffing load

Low; designed for play with minimal staff direction

omiVista / Mobii (OM Interactive; US channel SensoryOne)

Category

Projection, mobile sensory

Group vs individual

1 to small group; cart moves room to room

Dementia-stage fit (per vendor)

Dementia Care Suite (200+ activities); sensory focus suits middle and late stages

Mobility required

Lowest; projects onto tables, floors, and beds

Price band (public, Jun 2026)

Quote-based

Staffing load

Staff move, set up, and facilitate each session

PARO

Category

Companion robot (therapeutic seal)

Group vs individual

1:1

Dementia-stage fit (per vendor)

Studied for agitation and anxiety in dementia care

Mobility required

None; handheld, works at bedside

Price band (public, Jun 2026)

Not published; third-party listings around $6,100, lease around $169/month

Staffing load

1:1 facilitation; shared-touch device needs cleaning between users

ElliQ

Category

Companion robot (voice AI)

Group vs individual

1:1; built for older adults living alone

Dementia-stage fit (per vendor)

Designed for independent older adults, not marketed as a memory care product

Mobility required

None physically; requires verbal interaction

Price band (public, Jun 2026)

$39-$59/month by plan, plus $249 one-time fee, published

Staffing load

Minimal after setup; designed for unsupervised home use

iN2L by LifeLoop

Category

Engagement content platform

Group vs individual

Both; 65"/75" group touchscreens and a 23" mobile cart

Dementia-stage fit (per vendor)

7,000+ content items incl. dementia-focused content

Mobility required

Seated; touch interaction required

Price band (public, Jun 2026)

Quote-based

Staffing load

Staff-led sessions; adds engagement tracking for staff


Projection-based active engagement systems


Projection systems turn a floor, wall, or table into a play surface that responds to movement. There is nothing for residents to hold, wear, or learn, which is why this category has become a common choice for group programming in memory care.


EyeClick BEAM: group play at room scale


EyeClick BEAM is the option built for whole-room engagement rather than tabletop play. A single ceiling- or cart-mounted unit projects games onto the floor, a wall, or a table, and motion sensors turn residents' movements into the controls, so a full activity room can play together with no devices to hand out.


In practice, for an activity calendar:


  • 100+ games designed for senior care, from gentle sensory scenes to competitive group games, on 1 device that also serves family-visit days and intergenerational programming.
  • No learning curve for residents. No controllers, menus, or touchscreens; reaching, stepping, or rolling a wheelchair through the projection is the input, so residents with cognitive decline join without instruction.
  • Mixed-mobility by design. Floor mode serves standing and wheelchair users at once; wall and table modes serve seated groups. No splitting residents by ability.
  • No-touch hygiene. Play happens in light; nothing is shared hand to hand, which matters during every infection-control event.
  • Published pricing. BEAM starts at $5,796, and installation takes under 2 hours with no construction.

EyeClick has been building motion-activated projection for 20 years, with an installed base across thousands of schools, hundreds of therapy clinics, and 3,000+ entertainment venues. The honest limits: BEAM is not a clinical device, and it is not the most targeted choice for 1:1 bedside work with late-stage residents. That is where the next 2 systems come in. See the senior living overview and the interactive floor projector guide.


Tover Tovertafel: the dementia-specialist table


The Tovertafel ("magic table") is a projector that mounts above a table and projects light games residents play with hand movements. It is the most dementia-specialized system in this comparison: Tover's US site lists 47 games for seniors living with dementia, organized into 5 difficulty levels matched to different stages, and notes that its level 5 games are too challenging for middle and late stages, a sign of how deliberately the lower levels are tuned.


Tover positions the Tovertafel as research-driven, with claimed effects on apathy, restlessness, and social interaction. Games can be played individually or in a small group around the table, seated, with small movements, so it reaches residents a room-scale system may not. US pricing is quote-based: a device plus games subscription ("Open Play & Learn"), with a crowdfunding toolkit for communities raising funds.


Where it fits: memory care neighborhoods that want a dedicated, evidence-positioned tool for middle and late-stage residents. Where it does not: whole-room group programming, multi-surface use, or budgets that need a published price.


omiVista / Mobii: mobile sensory projection, including bedside


OM Interactive's omiVista systems, sold in the US through SensoryOne, project interactive scenes onto floors, tables, table trays, walls, and beds. The portable Mobii model is a height-adjustable cart that staff wheel wherever needed, including a resident's bedside, making it the lowest-mobility-requirement projection option here.


OMi's content is sensory-first: a Sensory Suite of 300+ activities and a Dementia Care Suite of 200+ activities, per the company. SensoryOne cites user surveys (92% of participants reminisced during sessions); treat vendor survey figures as directional. Pricing is quote-based; no US price is published.


Where it fits: communities prioritizing sensory sessions for middle and late-stage residents, and bedside engagement for residents who cannot come to an activity room. Where it does not: a staff-pushed, staff-facilitated cart costs setup time per session, and it is not designed for large-group active play.


Companion robots


Companion robots engage 1 resident at a time. They do not replace an activity program; communities use them for residents who are anxious, isolated, or unreachable by group programming.


PARO: the therapeutic seal for 1:1 calming


PARO is a robotic baby harp seal that responds to touch, sound, light, temperature, and posture through 5 sensor types, per its manufacturer. It has been used and studied in dementia care for over a decade, primarily for reducing agitation and anxiety, and has been described by its manufacturer and press coverage as a Class II medical device in the US.


PARO's manufacturer does not publish a price. Third-party listings as of June 2026 put purchase around $6,100, with leasing reported around $169/month; verify current terms with the US distributor. Practical notes: PARO is a 1:1 intervention, typically staff-facilitated, and a shared-touch plush device that needs a cleaning protocol between residents.


Where it fits: 1:1 work with residents experiencing agitation, especially in middle and late-stage dementia. Where it does not: group engagement or programming at scale; 1 seal serves 1 resident at a time.


ElliQ: a voice companion for residents living independently


ElliQ, made by Intuition Robotics, is a tabletop voice-first companion designed for older adults living alone. It proactively starts conversations, runs wellness check-ins, and connects to a caregiver app. Its pricing is published: as of June 2026, $59/month monthly, $49/month billed annually, or $39/month on a 24-month plan, plus a $249 one-time fee.


The key fit point: ElliQ is built for independent older adults and is not marketed as a memory care product; residents must engage verbally with an AI, which suits independent living far better than moderate or advanced dementia.


Where it fits: isolated independent living residents, or aging-in-place programs run by operators and area agencies. Where it does not: memory care programming or group activities.


Engagement content platforms


iN2L by LifeLoop: the content library on touchscreens


iN2L, now part of LifeLoop, is a long-established content platform in US senior living. LifeLoop puts the library at 7,000+ content items (games, trivia, travel video, worship, music), delivered on 65" and 75" group touchscreens and a 23" mobile cart, with the LifeLoop platform adding calendars, family communication, and engagement tracking. Pricing is quote-based; no list price is published.


The strengths are content breadth and documentation: activity teams get a deep program library plus records of who attended and engaged, which helps with care planning and surveys. The trade-offs for memory care: engagement runs through screens and touch, so residents must operate or follow a touchscreen, and shared screens carry the infection-control overhead of any high-touch surface. Staff drive the sessions.


Where it fits: communities that want 1 platform for content, calendars, and family communication across independent living through memory care. Where it does not: no-instruction, movement-based play for residents who cannot or will not use screens.


Decision guide: which system should you buy first?


Answer these 4 questions and the shortlist picks itself.


  1. Is your gap group programming or 1:1? If your activity calendar needs a reliable group draw across mixed abilities, start with room-scale projection (EyeClick BEAM). If your gap is specific residents group programming cannot reach, start with a 1:1 tool (PARO for agitation, Tovertafel or Mobii for small-group and bedside dementia work).
  2. What stage are the residents you most need to reach? Early to middle stages engage well with active group play. For predominantly late-stage or bed-bound residents, prioritize bedside-capable systems (Mobii) or dementia-tuned table play (Tovertafel).
  3. How much staff time can a session cost? Systems residents cannot operate themselves turn into staff time forever. Count facilitation, setup, and cleaning per session, not just purchase price.
  4. What does your budget process need? If you need a number on paper this quarter, most systems here are quote-based; EyeClick (from $5,796) and ElliQ (from $39/month plus $249) publish pricing as of June 2026.


Many communities pair categories rather than choosing one: a projection system as the engine of the group calendar, plus a 1:1 tool for residents who need it. That combination covers more of the resident population than any single device.


Frequently Asked Questions

The group activities that tend to work most reliably for dementia patients are failure-free: music, reminiscence, simple physical games, and sensory play where there is no wrong move. Motion-activated projection works well here because the activity responds to any movement, so residents at different stages can participate in the same session without instructions, score-keeping, or devices to hold.

Published prices in this category run from $39/month (ElliQ, plus a $249 one-time fee) to $5,796 entry price for a room-scale projection system (EyeClick BEAM). Most facility systems (Tovertafel, omiVista/Mobii, iN2L by LifeLoop) do not publish prices and quote per community; third-party listings put PARO around $6,100. Compare total cost including subscriptions, content fees, and staff time per session.

Yes, but mostly from internal and philanthropic sources, not federal programs. Communities commonly fund engagement technology through activities or quality-of-life budgets, foundation and auxiliary fundraising, family councils, and local civic-group donations; some vendors help directly (Tover publishes a crowdfunding toolkit for communities raising funds for a unit). One common assumption to avoid: Civil Money Penalty (CMP) reinvestment funds are generally NOT an option, as current CMS guidance lists high-dollar technology "such as but not limited to engagement technology" among uses it will not approve; confirm with your state CMP program before ruling it in or out.

It depends on the input method, which is a critical comparison point for dementia care. Projection systems (EyeClick, Tovertafel, omiVista) respond to natural movement, so there is nothing to learn. Touchscreen platforms require residents to operate or follow a screen, and voice companions like ElliQ require verbal interaction with an AI, which is a poor fit for moderate to advanced dementia.

For bed-bound residents, mobile projection that reaches the bedside is the most direct option: OMi's Mobii projects onto beds and table trays. For late-stage residents who are seated, Tovertafel's lower difficulty levels are designed for middle and late stages per Tover, and PARO is used 1:1 for agitation. Room-scale systems serve this population with calm sensory scenes but are optimized for group engagement rather than bedside work.

Floor and wall projection is no-touch: residents play in projected light, so nothing passes hand to hand, which keeps group activities running during infection-control events. Table projection is low-touch (hands move over a shared table surface). Shared touchscreens and handheld devices like plush robots need cleaning protocols between users, adding staff load.

Budget first for whatever reaches the most resident-hours per staff-hour, which for most communities is group programming: 1 facilitator and a room-scale system engage a whole room at once. Then add 1:1 tools for the specific residents group programming cannot reach. Buying 1:1 devices first tends to concentrate benefit in a handful of residents while the activity calendar stays thin.

Related articles

Let's Create Something Amazing Together

Whether you're in education, senior care, or entertainment, we're here to help transform your space with interactive technology.